We live in a society where more people vote for American Idol contestants than for the President of the United States. Here's why:
- Idol contestants give a straight-from-the-heart performance and are judged on their talents. Presidential candidates talk around issues and are judged on whether they were "less offensive" than their opponents.
- Idol judges give blunt feedback on a contestant's performance. (Okay, only two of the judges). Looking at recent presidential debates, the moderator gives no feedback and the media gives very obtuse feedback.
- American Idol is entertaining. Presidential debates are seldom entertaining. Or informative.
- Americans feel like they can make a difference by voting for Idol contestants. Americans feel that their vote for President isn't meaningful.
- The packaging of the Idol brand is professional and eye catching. Nothing presented during a presidential campaign has that same quality.
Maybe presidential contests need to be updated for modern America.
- All the candidates gather, they give a speech and the Supreme Court narrows the field to a "final three".
- The final three get to give a speech and then perform a skit pertaining to their favorite key social issue.
- Jay Leno, David Letterman and Jon Stewart rate the candidates and give their blunt, but comical feedback.
- America votes by phone for their "winner". 24-hours the new president is crowned. The losing candidates go on a 10-city tour, performing their skits and telling witty political stories. Or making movies about the environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment